
anyone know a good general pattern to go but when actually making the thing?
the symbols i am not worried about, just the robe.
i am aware of the deliberate blind in all the pics one can find of the robe, and can procure the correct symbols.
Moderator: Moderators - Public
daredevil92103 wrote:i am aware of the deliberate blind in all the pics one can find of the robe, and can procure the correct symbols.
Jim Eshelman wrote:the blue triangle that descendeth is Nuit, and the red triangle that ascendeth is Hadit.
frateruranus wrote:Some lineages use a black robe with the same symbols nowadays to differentiate the 0=0 robe from the 5=6 robe.
luxinhominefactum wrote:heh... i didn't know you all still used the old-school robes, jim, that's actually pretty cool. my own lineage has altered them somewhat.
frateruranus wrote:Crowley would have Probationers working together such as the Rites of Eleusis & reading his working diaries like the Bartzabel working etc. Practicality & the Oaths of the A.'.A.'. makeit impossible for Probationers to not know each other in communities where an A.'.A.'. teacher is present & taking local students. Under the guidance of a higher initiate, say a Zelator or so, the "damage" can be minimalized. Essentially though, the idea is you don't share your personal work with others outside of your superior or when helping an inferior (in the sense of someone under you) by sharing your experiences. Lectures etc. are also useful for an A.'.A.'. instructor who works in private. Also, what of an OTO lodge (or similar org) that has a few members of the Probationer Grade... does that mean they are forbidden to work the Mass or Lodge group rituals or even the meet with each other in social gatherings, workings etc.? The idea is sound, but to execute it literally is impossible.
Jim Eshelman wrote:frateruranus wrote:Some lineages use a black robe with the same symbols nowadays to differentiate the 0=0 robe from the 5=6 robe.
I see. Nope, that's wrong. (Not a blind, just wrong.) It's one of the more important symbols of the 0=0 robe that it is exactly the same as the robe of Adeptus Minor Without.
Arsihsis wrote:In Ch. 23 of Magick Without Tears we are told that for a 0=0, "plain black is correct; and the Unicursal Hexagram might be embroidered upon the breast". Is this because the 0=0 robe doubled for 5=6, & possibly the original 0=0 robe design was made exclusive to 5=6 toward the end of 666's career on account of the micro/macro uniting aspects of the design?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests